Posted by
jiezi220 on Monday, December 14, 2009 8:25:48 PM
It began with a scuffle in a snooker hall. By all accounts, the
altercation at the Manor Club in Haringey, north London, last January
was over nothing in particular, a respect issue between two "mid-level"
members of
pearl jewelry two of the capital's most violent Turkish gangs.
Losing
respect in gangland Britain these days is, say police, sufficient to
ignite long-running feuds. When you lose face in a stand-off between
the Bombacilar and the Tottenham Boys, north London's most prominent
and feared Turkish crews, the fallout can be fatal.
In the
following weeks tensions grew, finally erupting on 22 March as Holloway
shopkeeper Ahmet Paytak, 50, locked up his grocery store after another
slow Sunday. A motorbike, an unusual red and black Benelli TNT, mounted
the pavement outside. Its pillion passenger took aim; the assassin
couldn't miss. Paytak was murdered in the doorway of Euro Wine and Food
at 10.40pm. Moments later his 21-year-old son was shot in the leg as he
turned to face the killer. The gunman has never been found, despite a
£20,000 reward and the almost immediate realisation that the wrong man
had been killed. Paytak was innocent, a "case of
wholesale pearl jewelry mistaken identity", according to murder squad officers.
But
the blunder failed to stem the bloodshed. Quite the opposite. Shootings
between the Bombacilar and the Tottenham Boys increased. "The levels of
violence have been shocking, and the number of shootings there, in
London terms, is very high," said Metropolitan police commander Steve
Kavanagh.
Three weeks ago the feud's most audacious killing took
place. Oktay Erbasli, a prominent member of the Tottenham Boys, was
waiting at traffic lights at a busy junction in his Range Rover when a
motorcycle pulled alongside. A hitman linked to the Bombacilar gang
opened fire, killing the 23-year-old, but missing his five-year-old
stepson seated beside him. Within the tit-for-tat mentality of gangland
retribution, reprisals are inevitable. In Erbasli's case it came within
72 hours: Cem Duzgun, 21, had been playing snooker in a Clapton social
club with friends when two hooded men approached at 10.50pm and
pearl jewelry wholesale opened fire with a semi-automatic weapon.
For
Scotland Yard's senior command, Duzgun's death was the final straw.
Something had to give, something drastic was required to tackle the
vortex of violence. The decision was taken; for the first time,
officers armed with Heckler & Koch semi-automatic sub-machine guns
would be deployed on routine patrol on London's streets. They could
also have fast motorbikes at their disposal. History may well interpret
Duzgun's killing as the catalyst for the UK's first step towards an
armed police service.
But the news last week attracted the
inevitable backlash, with critics accusing the Met of a
disproportionate, knee-jerk response that challenged the long-held
British tradition of policing by consent and not force.
Yet the
details behind the agreement to routinely deploy C019, the Met's
specialist firearms unit, on selected London streets reveals a
narrative that offers a disturbing insight into how violent, anarchic
gangs are able to terrorise and oppress entire communities. The
decision, ratified in a recent meeting between Met borough commanders
and CO19 senior officers, had followed months of anxious reports from
community leaders that their areas were under siege and concerns among
senior officers that they risked losing control.